hrushi_j
08-19 02:40 PM
the effort you put in is great. i thought of doing something similar, but i gave up as there is no true indicator regarding the overlap between the two sites. I have my information on both the sites, but under two totally different userids. There is no telling how many others have their information in both places. All in all, if you consider the two data to be independent of each other, then it will have a degree of pessimism that will give us a worst case scenario.
congrats.
You are right; I am using IV and data separately. The overall assumptions, taking an example of EB3 are as follows.
1) Add up all actual approved cases for EB3 India by the approval year as in column P. In case of EB3 it is 117332. The data for each year is available on: Visa Statistics (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_1476.html) .
2) Now, in column L, I am re-distributing the total approved 117332 in column P by the priority year because the USCIS TABLE V data is only by approval year and not by priority year. The % approved distribution for each priority year is derived from either or IV
3) Deduce the total pending cases for EB3 India and put in the total line of column M. The EB3 India it is 444436. This is derived from Ron Gotcher�s post: Collaboration on visa quota data/analysis - Page 6 - Immigration Information Discussion Forum (http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/general-immigration-questions/8419-collaboration-on-visa-quota-data-analysis-6.html) . To see the derivation for the number 444436 you can click on sheet2 of the uploaded excel file. Assumption1: The pre-adjudicated cases are almost all the pending cases for EB3 India.
4) In column M, I am re-distributing the total pending cases by priority year. The % pending distribution for each priority year is derived from either or IV.
5) Assumption2: Total cases with USCIS for EB3 India = Total Approved + Total Pending. So the whole universe for EB3 India is 117332+ 44436 = 161768
If you see for EB3 India, there are only 1325 data points as compared to 3375 in IV. Therefore, I am calculating and using the % trends for approvals and pending separately. The upper table in the excel sheet is based on trend and the lower is based on IV trend.
Whether the data in or IV are dependent or primary does not matter because I am just using it to get the trends of the percentage approval and pending for every year. However, I assume that the TABLE V reports and the pending pre-adjudicated numbers included primary as well.
congrats.
You are right; I am using IV and data separately. The overall assumptions, taking an example of EB3 are as follows.
1) Add up all actual approved cases for EB3 India by the approval year as in column P. In case of EB3 it is 117332. The data for each year is available on: Visa Statistics (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_1476.html) .
2) Now, in column L, I am re-distributing the total approved 117332 in column P by the priority year because the USCIS TABLE V data is only by approval year and not by priority year. The % approved distribution for each priority year is derived from either or IV
3) Deduce the total pending cases for EB3 India and put in the total line of column M. The EB3 India it is 444436. This is derived from Ron Gotcher�s post: Collaboration on visa quota data/analysis - Page 6 - Immigration Information Discussion Forum (http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/general-immigration-questions/8419-collaboration-on-visa-quota-data-analysis-6.html) . To see the derivation for the number 444436 you can click on sheet2 of the uploaded excel file. Assumption1: The pre-adjudicated cases are almost all the pending cases for EB3 India.
4) In column M, I am re-distributing the total pending cases by priority year. The % pending distribution for each priority year is derived from either or IV.
5) Assumption2: Total cases with USCIS for EB3 India = Total Approved + Total Pending. So the whole universe for EB3 India is 117332+ 44436 = 161768
If you see for EB3 India, there are only 1325 data points as compared to 3375 in IV. Therefore, I am calculating and using the % trends for approvals and pending separately. The upper table in the excel sheet is based on trend and the lower is based on IV trend.
Whether the data in or IV are dependent or primary does not matter because I am just using it to get the trends of the percentage approval and pending for every year. However, I assume that the TABLE V reports and the pending pre-adjudicated numbers included primary as well.
wallpaper Miley Cyrus smoking what
samcam
11-10 04:05 PM
M from MO
kicca
01-08 02:26 PM
Mo Members Write The Letters! Talk To Your Employer! Talk To The Lawmakers!
Make Your Voice Be Heard! Make Your Voice Be Heard Loud And Clear!
Make Your Voice Be Heard! Make Your Voice Be Heard Loud And Clear!
2011 Bong Video Miley Cyrus
gk_2000
03-23 05:27 PM
Earlier they used to incinerate humans in furnaces and gas chambers. Now fathers raping their daughters seem to be new national timepass for Germans/Austrians.
Shall we start counting the heinous crimes taking place in your country of origin right now at this very minute? Keep a check on your tongue/keyboard before spilling rubbish all over.
Shall we start counting the heinous crimes taking place in your country of origin right now at this very minute? Keep a check on your tongue/keyboard before spilling rubbish all over.
more...
needhelp!
09-27 06:37 PM
Yes, NY Times link doesn't work. Can OP please edit and remove the link? Also IMO, we should pick one or two items and click/digg wholeheartedly.
Looks like not many people follow through with DIGGing. Fewer than 100 diggs so far.
We should make Digg membership a prerequisite for IV membership :D
Looks like not many people follow through with DIGGing. Fewer than 100 diggs so far.
We should make Digg membership a prerequisite for IV membership :D
Canuck
02-02 11:58 PM
I have a tax-based proposal in order to:
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
more...
Macaca
02-16 12:46 PM
The woman's name is Sue.
2010 She clearly inhales the smoke
nrk
07-22 03:05 PM
How did you get the RFE, did you get the notification from USCIS directly ??
did you changed attorney or the same attorney informed you.
I had switched jobs using EAD last year and my attorney had also advised not to file AC-21 documentation. I got an RFE last month and we sent the EVL from new employer. USCIS has accepted RFE and the status now shows "Case processing resumed".
did you changed attorney or the same attorney informed you.
I had switched jobs using EAD last year and my attorney had also advised not to file AC-21 documentation. I got an RFE last month and we sent the EVL from new employer. USCIS has accepted RFE and the status now shows "Case processing resumed".
more...
vikramark
07-19 08:43 AM
Hello,
I just learned about IV few days back although I am in US for about 8 yrs now and still struggling to get my Green Card , IV is doing a great job and there efforts can not be measured in terms of money we donate .
Can somebody pls guide me how do I set up my monthly contribution?
Thanks.
I just learned about IV few days back although I am in US for about 8 yrs now and still struggling to get my Green Card , IV is doing a great job and there efforts can not be measured in terms of money we donate .
Can somebody pls guide me how do I set up my monthly contribution?
Thanks.
hair Miley Cyrus bong salvia food
ThankyouIV
12-13 08:21 PM
Dear IV,
I'm sure you will help me on this one. I've to be patience , as it's a weekend.
It's a like sick feeling, in other words feeling like escaping from regular human life....I had enough is enough, going through, lay-offs, health issues and what not....I don't want anyone to go through this.
Have a good weekend guys!
I'm sure you will help me on this one. I've to be patience , as it's a weekend.
It's a like sick feeling, in other words feeling like escaping from regular human life....I had enough is enough, going through, lay-offs, health issues and what not....I don't want anyone to go through this.
Have a good weekend guys!
more...
thakkarbhav
02-07 03:42 PM
Never mind..hope you get your EAD soon and no need to leave current employment...Normally new arrival in home brings lots of luck so keep faith.
i hope you are being funny. because for my original questions of this thread.....they are still unresolved. what i forgot has nothing to with it directly.
thank you everyone for all your input and helpful suggestions. i will post an update on the situation.
i hope you are being funny. because for my original questions of this thread.....they are still unresolved. what i forgot has nothing to with it directly.
thank you everyone for all your input and helpful suggestions. i will post an update on the situation.
hot Miley Cyrus smoking pot video.
rustamehind
07-20 01:55 PM
1. Receipt notice
2. FP notice
3. While I-485 not approved{
Get/Renew EAD/AP
new FP notices
get RFEs
wait
}
4. Get GC
5. Wonder if all the stress was worth it :)
Love this man.You have good PROGRAMMING sense of humour.:)
2. FP notice
3. While I-485 not approved{
Get/Renew EAD/AP
new FP notices
get RFEs
wait
}
4. Get GC
5. Wonder if all the stress was worth it :)
Love this man.You have good PROGRAMMING sense of humour.:)
more...
house Miley Cyrus Smoking From Bong
prakgc
02-19 04:15 PM
Yes but we are talking of a case where when we renew our EAD through the efile process then we will be going to a local ASC to do fingerprinting anyway.
USCIS will not send us a FP notice. Usually after paying the fees through efile a page will come which has a number to call to a take a appt with local ASC.
If i understand correct that fingerprint should take care of everything because it will be based on your A# and is supposed to be for EAD and 485 because as of Feb 15th both are linked Biometric wise.
It's not so clear to me. The new procedure does not make it mandatory to have FP done to obtain an EAD. So you could very well renew your EAD without having to provide FPs.
What the document says is that when filling 485 + EAD they will use the same set of FPs for all applications which is cool but doesn't guarantee that you will get an FP notice.
It only says that IF you get an FP notice it will apply to both EAD and I-485.
USCIS will not send us a FP notice. Usually after paying the fees through efile a page will come which has a number to call to a take a appt with local ASC.
If i understand correct that fingerprint should take care of everything because it will be based on your A# and is supposed to be for EAD and 485 because as of Feb 15th both are linked Biometric wise.
It's not so clear to me. The new procedure does not make it mandatory to have FP done to obtain an EAD. So you could very well renew your EAD without having to provide FPs.
What the document says is that when filling 485 + EAD they will use the same set of FPs for all applications which is cool but doesn't guarantee that you will get an FP notice.
It only says that IF you get an FP notice it will apply to both EAD and I-485.
tattoo Miley Cyrus
ruchigup
10-01 10:58 AM
Don't burn your good relation with your employer.
But just politely try to negotiate saying that since your wife is expecting and your expenses are going to increase in next couple of months, can they consider 20% cut instead of 40%
But just politely try to negotiate saying that since your wife is expecting and your expenses are going to increase in next couple of months, can they consider 20% cut instead of 40%
more...
pictures Miley Cyrus Gets Bong-Smoking
lazycis
11-29 01:31 PM
Notifying the USCIS is not necessary, but is recommended in case the I-140 is revoked.
If I-140 is revoked, you must notify the USCIS about your new job, otherwise I-485 will be denied. NOID usually follows I-140 withdrawal/revocation.
If I-140 is revoked, you must notify the USCIS about your new job, otherwise I-485 will be denied. NOID usually follows I-140 withdrawal/revocation.
dresses Miley Cyrus: Puffing Away
obviously
08-06 01:30 PM
If parents that are in an EB queue have a US born child = US Citizen, can the child sponsor a Green Card on behalf of the parents and get them the GC?
???? Just a thought... there could be a legal loophole allowing this... I dont see any language that talks about the age of the US Citizen...
Hmmm....
???? Just a thought... there could be a legal loophole allowing this... I dont see any language that talks about the age of the US Citizen...
Hmmm....
more...
makeup miley cyrus smoking bong full
bijualex29
07-17 09:08 AM
Can anyone has access to it?
girlfriend Miley Cyrus Bong Rips
gc28262
08-10 11:32 AM
I may end up in the same boat as you after spending 12 years in this mess. I am thinking that if your previous employer is OK you can file 140 under EB2 while working for your current employer.
I could be wrong but I don't think there is a requirement to work for the sponsoring company while filing I-140 or I485. As long as your previous employer has the intention to hire you(by providing the offer letter) once GC is approved you should be fine.
GC is for future employment.
IMO this is the best route. If your previous company is fine with this ask them to process I-140 also. Once your GC is approved, you can work for your old employer for an year or so. That way you won't be violating intent to work for the future employer also not leaving your present employer.
I could be wrong but I don't think there is a requirement to work for the sponsoring company while filing I-140 or I485. As long as your previous employer has the intention to hire you(by providing the offer letter) once GC is approved you should be fine.
GC is for future employment.
IMO this is the best route. If your previous company is fine with this ask them to process I-140 also. Once your GC is approved, you can work for your old employer for an year or so. That way you won't be violating intent to work for the future employer also not leaving your present employer.
hairstyles Miley+cyrus+smoking+
sertasheep
09-23 10:54 PM
I sent it to pcs by mistake...:o
adviva, I've resent the PM to you.
HTH,
adviva, I've resent the PM to you.
HTH,
needhelp!
10-02 06:35 PM
bump
man-woman-and-gc
08-28 06:13 PM
As mentioned in my previous post, one should at least stay with their employer, at the time of GC approval, for around 6 months to a year .
Then again, nothing about the time line is case in stone (that is nothing is said in the law books). However the shorter the duration, the more the burden on you to prove that you did not get your GC with no intention of working for the employer.
As someone else mentioned AC21 invalidates the requirement that you need to work for the same employer. That is a gray zone. Based on my understanding:
1) When applying for any stage of the processing, you need to have intent to work for the employer (otherwise, legally you have committed fraud).
2) Even with AC21, I believe you need to stay with your then current employer for some period of time after getting GC.
I know people who have left their jobs within a month of two of their GC and have had no problems even with their citizenship. So it is up to you to maintain your own good sense of security on how long you want to stay with a company after GC. Most lawyers' opinion is to stay for at least a year - provided (their boiler plate advice) that you dont have premeditated intention to leave.
Once you are happy and secure with the "cooling off" period after GC, you can work in any field (not meant to deride, but you could also work as a hamburger flipper if you so choose), or take a break.
Does that 1 year time period start counting after the GC has been received? What If I have already been working for the employer for over 3 years...can i change my job in the same month as I got my GC approved?
Then again, nothing about the time line is case in stone (that is nothing is said in the law books). However the shorter the duration, the more the burden on you to prove that you did not get your GC with no intention of working for the employer.
As someone else mentioned AC21 invalidates the requirement that you need to work for the same employer. That is a gray zone. Based on my understanding:
1) When applying for any stage of the processing, you need to have intent to work for the employer (otherwise, legally you have committed fraud).
2) Even with AC21, I believe you need to stay with your then current employer for some period of time after getting GC.
I know people who have left their jobs within a month of two of their GC and have had no problems even with their citizenship. So it is up to you to maintain your own good sense of security on how long you want to stay with a company after GC. Most lawyers' opinion is to stay for at least a year - provided (their boiler plate advice) that you dont have premeditated intention to leave.
Once you are happy and secure with the "cooling off" period after GC, you can work in any field (not meant to deride, but you could also work as a hamburger flipper if you so choose), or take a break.
Does that 1 year time period start counting after the GC has been received? What If I have already been working for the employer for over 3 years...can i change my job in the same month as I got my GC approved?
No comments:
Post a Comment