GTGC
07-25 09:19 PM
Thanks for posting this. I am one of those who got an incorrect receipt date on my 485 receipt notice. I called the customer service back in october 2007 and was told there is nothing they can do about it. I am going to email/call again to see if they can fix this.
My I-485 app got transferred from TSC to NSC.
Original TSC RD= 7/2/2007
ND= 8/23/2007.
Transferred to NSC RD= 8/29/2007
ND= 3/2/2008
I called USCIS this afternoon and this CR takes all my info, asks for my zip, and then says-
"Oh based on the info you gave me and the system says that your application will be processed after 425 days. There is nothing more I can do about this application at this time�
I told her that NSC is already processing application for 3rd August 2007 and there are certainly not 425 days between August 2nd and August 29th.
Then she takes my info again and says- "Yes it will be another year and a half till they look at your application�- and mumbled something about FBI not giving them the info. �Your app is only a year old, there are people who have been waiting for 5 years, so don�t expect your application to be processed"
I asked to be transferred to an IO - she refused and said take an Info pass if you have any more question and hung up!!
So I guess the next month PD being current doesn�t matter........I have to wait another 425 days*sigh* :confused::mad::(:eek:
My I-485 app got transferred from TSC to NSC.
Original TSC RD= 7/2/2007
ND= 8/23/2007.
Transferred to NSC RD= 8/29/2007
ND= 3/2/2008
I called USCIS this afternoon and this CR takes all my info, asks for my zip, and then says-
"Oh based on the info you gave me and the system says that your application will be processed after 425 days. There is nothing more I can do about this application at this time�
I told her that NSC is already processing application for 3rd August 2007 and there are certainly not 425 days between August 2nd and August 29th.
Then she takes my info again and says- "Yes it will be another year and a half till they look at your application�- and mumbled something about FBI not giving them the info. �Your app is only a year old, there are people who have been waiting for 5 years, so don�t expect your application to be processed"
I asked to be transferred to an IO - she refused and said take an Info pass if you have any more question and hung up!!
So I guess the next month PD being current doesn�t matter........I have to wait another 425 days*sigh* :confused::mad::(:eek:
wallpaper Apple iphone4 theme wallpaper
ricky26
12-19 10:06 AM
Obama is using "trial and error" technique, do not have real political game playing experience. He is learning on the job. Empty rhetoric. Some may work, surely not all.
immigrant2007
09-10 01:10 PM
Please pardon me from interrupting but here is what i think.
I thinkThis year will be good for EB3.
With 700 per queter going to EB2I and EB2C, this means that EB2I will go only upto few months by Jul-2011 before the spill kicks IN.
Once the spill over kicks in EB2 will move by atmost Jul-2007 (as there are won't be any 485 filed for India / China post 2007. Even if they are it is unlikely that they will be processed in 1 or 2 months). So I expect EB3 to use most of the spill over this year.
CATCH is: IF USCIS allows filing of 485 before July-2011 (till May 2011) for POST all those who missed 2007 or had thier Labor -I140 approved after that, then the above doesn't hold true.
ALSO
WE NEED COMPLETE TRANSPARENCY is NUMBER RIGHT upto all the cases per country per month per category for:
485s (pending and approved)
140s (pending and approved)
any other suggestions.
We need these numbers becuase its our ******** life is at stake here.
Also I think USCIS is not being starightforwad to us on the usage and the numebrs relased earlier.
We need to check check how many cases are pending in Jan-02, Feb02 (monthwise for India EB3), the approvals does not indicate that
I thinkThis year will be good for EB3.
With 700 per queter going to EB2I and EB2C, this means that EB2I will go only upto few months by Jul-2011 before the spill kicks IN.
Once the spill over kicks in EB2 will move by atmost Jul-2007 (as there are won't be any 485 filed for India / China post 2007. Even if they are it is unlikely that they will be processed in 1 or 2 months). So I expect EB3 to use most of the spill over this year.
CATCH is: IF USCIS allows filing of 485 before July-2011 (till May 2011) for POST all those who missed 2007 or had thier Labor -I140 approved after that, then the above doesn't hold true.
ALSO
WE NEED COMPLETE TRANSPARENCY is NUMBER RIGHT upto all the cases per country per month per category for:
485s (pending and approved)
140s (pending and approved)
any other suggestions.
We need these numbers becuase its our ******** life is at stake here.
Also I think USCIS is not being starightforwad to us on the usage and the numebrs relased earlier.
We need to check check how many cases are pending in Jan-02, Feb02 (monthwise for India EB3), the approvals does not indicate that
2011 100 HD Iphone 4 Wallpapers
kjohri
07-04 03:30 PM
Hi -
I am in Greenboro NC
KJ
I am in Greenboro NC
KJ
more...
pom
02-24 07:01 PM
guig0 >> Why is everybody reading my mind tonight? :hangover:
And I honnestly don't know how I'll vote for. Probably Mariofan. Or Megatron. Or both :evilMod:
And I honnestly don't know how I'll vote for. Probably Mariofan. Or Megatron. Or both :evilMod:
rvr_jcop
02-21 12:33 AM
I invoked AC21 and changed employer in November.
I received an RFE today when my PD is nowhere close to what USCIS is processing. I was wondering if anyone else had any updates on their cases with priority date close to mine.
Is your PD 11/2001 or 11/2002? I saw some folks who got RFE's, LUDs whose priority date is in 2003 (Mine is May'03 and I got soft LUDs on mine last week). So I guess USCIS is pre-adjudicating the applications whose PD is not current. Atleast on some applications...if not all.
I received an RFE today when my PD is nowhere close to what USCIS is processing. I was wondering if anyone else had any updates on their cases with priority date close to mine.
Is your PD 11/2001 or 11/2002? I saw some folks who got RFE's, LUDs whose priority date is in 2003 (Mine is May'03 and I got soft LUDs on mine last week). So I guess USCIS is pre-adjudicating the applications whose PD is not current. Atleast on some applications...if not all.
more...
gangster
08-22 03:01 PM
To Julyfiler
Let me thank you for your insight. And good luck with your GC.
Let me thank you for your insight. And good luck with your GC.
2010 Iphone+4+wallpapers+hd
gsc999
07-18 12:41 PM
I called almost daily since 7/2 (bad) news came out and had very professional and pleasant service. The "level 2 reps" looked up by name, then often offered to look up by A-number to make sure that case not showing up on name search is not because of a typo made by the person entering the case into the system. I eventually got my three receipt numbers over the phone on Monday. The package was delivered on 6/15. No paper yet.
--
You didn't even wait for 30 days before you started calling e'day :rolleyes: .
You got your receipt number on Monday(07/16) because that is 30 days from
06/15 when USCIS received it.
I would get mad, if people kept calling for an update even when one wasn't due
Maybe, poor immm got the same rep after she spoke with Fascinated R for 11 days in a row. No wonder :p
--
You didn't even wait for 30 days before you started calling e'day :rolleyes: .
You got your receipt number on Monday(07/16) because that is 30 days from
06/15 when USCIS received it.
I would get mad, if people kept calling for an update even when one wasn't due
Maybe, poor immm got the same rep after she spoke with Fascinated R for 11 days in a row. No wonder :p
more...
Legal
08-03 10:01 PM
Sorry to hear your situation. Hope things work out soon when the dates are current for you.
Finger prints are done for FBI clearance and it is unlikely GC will be issued without it. Name check is a different story, there is a USCIS memo stating if 180 days have passed after name check was initiated, 485 adjudication/ green card issuance cannot be delayed.
Finger prints are done for FBI clearance and it is unlikely GC will be issued without it. Name check is a different story, there is a USCIS memo stating if 180 days have passed after name check was initiated, 485 adjudication/ green card issuance cannot be delayed.
hair HD wallpaper for iphone 4
vbkris77
07-09 12:25 AM
I support this. Can IV Core provide some input and insight into this idea and also the recent memo that emerged on on AoS.
Thanks!!
Raji
I am not usually not a nay sayer. But with CIR discussion around corner, it is an easy shot to say wait for your turn. So could have been this E-Verify, But our rightwing friends did a very hard sell (Look at their websites with banners to call etc.) and I think administration supported it in private because that is going to put pressure on House Democrats and conservatives from south. They will have to face angry hispanics next year if house fails CIR this time. With strict E-Verify and tough economy they are going to face bad time and will boot out all the Nay sayers for CIR in next election.
I think we need to wait and watch.
Besides If they try to attach our provisions in this omnibus, CHC very well know that they can kiss a good bye to CIR for good. So they will do their best to take ouir provisions for hostage. My 2 cents!!!..
If they attach our provisions though, I will be very happy..
Thanks!!
Raji
I am not usually not a nay sayer. But with CIR discussion around corner, it is an easy shot to say wait for your turn. So could have been this E-Verify, But our rightwing friends did a very hard sell (Look at their websites with banners to call etc.) and I think administration supported it in private because that is going to put pressure on House Democrats and conservatives from south. They will have to face angry hispanics next year if house fails CIR this time. With strict E-Verify and tough economy they are going to face bad time and will boot out all the Nay sayers for CIR in next election.
I think we need to wait and watch.
Besides If they try to attach our provisions in this omnibus, CHC very well know that they can kiss a good bye to CIR for good. So they will do their best to take ouir provisions for hostage. My 2 cents!!!..
If they attach our provisions though, I will be very happy..
more...
tulips
10-16 03:35 PM
I am sorry to ask here but I cannot seem to find how to start a new thread or new forum question. I wanted to get some advice on H4 visa. We started our GC process and our PD is Nov 06 and recently my husband decided to move out of country for studies. He started the GC process and quit his sponsoring company. SO I think our application will be considered abandoned? and he cannot come to US on AP. Can he come on H4 because I am on H1 B? If yes then can he apply from his current resident country? What all documents are needed?
---------------------------------------
Thanks Ramaonline.
Did you already file I140 and I485? At what stage is the GC process? AP is only possible if you have a pending I485.
- Yes, I 140 is approved and my husband has used AP earlier when working in USA.
H1 is a dual intent visa while H4 is a derivative of H1. Assuming you haven't filed for I140, and I485; the labor cert itself does not give any immigration status. Note that the labor certifications expire in 6 months. Your husband can come on H4 visa as you have a valid H1B status.
- Yes, I have not filed for my GC. Now, looking at the dates and waiting times I feel very discouraged to apply. We cannot afford to wait 6-10 years so I guess I will just leave too once my H1 B expires and then as I understand can come again on H1 B after being outside for 1 year.
You can apply for H4 visa at any US consulate - Check the specific consulate website for details about reqd documentation etc.
- OK. I will check again but I didn't find anything for H4 ..only work visa. Can they reject it too? Also, copy of my 797 is sufficient?
Thanks again and Happy Diwali!
__________________
---------------------------------------
Thanks Ramaonline.
Did you already file I140 and I485? At what stage is the GC process? AP is only possible if you have a pending I485.
- Yes, I 140 is approved and my husband has used AP earlier when working in USA.
H1 is a dual intent visa while H4 is a derivative of H1. Assuming you haven't filed for I140, and I485; the labor cert itself does not give any immigration status. Note that the labor certifications expire in 6 months. Your husband can come on H4 visa as you have a valid H1B status.
- Yes, I have not filed for my GC. Now, looking at the dates and waiting times I feel very discouraged to apply. We cannot afford to wait 6-10 years so I guess I will just leave too once my H1 B expires and then as I understand can come again on H1 B after being outside for 1 year.
You can apply for H4 visa at any US consulate - Check the specific consulate website for details about reqd documentation etc.
- OK. I will check again but I didn't find anything for H4 ..only work visa. Can they reject it too? Also, copy of my 797 is sufficient?
Thanks again and Happy Diwali!
__________________
hot Hd+iphone+wallpapers+
pappu
05-05 01:55 PM
Pappu,
I do not agree. Employer working with attorney directly on PERM does not cause an abuse.
Infact at PERM stage, it is the employer who should infact take the lead. PERM and I-140 are employer filings, and attorney should really be representing the employer for most part and some part for the employee.
Also private firms and sole-proprietorships might prefer not to reveal the salary details of all its employees, expenses and net profits to the employee. If they work with the attorney, they can reveal the information just to USCIS, and not to employees. So you cannot judge the employer abuse just because he dont want to handover all the comapny financial paperwork to an employee.
I also mentioned that, make your judgement on whether to continue with that employer, since you may need full support from employer at many stages.
I agree that, the employee should get the required paperwork he is supposed to keep. And H1B full filing paperwork is one of them. I am sure the H1B filing paperwork will have some high level financial report of the company.
PERM supporting documentation, I140 supporting documentation are not necessarily to be distributed to employees. But I agree, employee should ask for and get a copy of the original PERM application (not supporting documentation) and I140 approval notice at minimum.
You are correct in your comments to a certain extent. However such secrecy does not help in the application process and employer tends to deprive the paperwork details to the employee leading to abuse. Financial information is not just needed at PERM stage but also at I140 stage especially when the employee gets a A2P RFE. I have also heard employees taking financial details of the company with them when traveling to get their H1 visa stamped.
I must admit however that my knowledge with sole proprietorship and private companies is limited. Others who have worked in such companies may know more and can tell from their experience (If the employer was good).
I do not agree. Employer working with attorney directly on PERM does not cause an abuse.
Infact at PERM stage, it is the employer who should infact take the lead. PERM and I-140 are employer filings, and attorney should really be representing the employer for most part and some part for the employee.
Also private firms and sole-proprietorships might prefer not to reveal the salary details of all its employees, expenses and net profits to the employee. If they work with the attorney, they can reveal the information just to USCIS, and not to employees. So you cannot judge the employer abuse just because he dont want to handover all the comapny financial paperwork to an employee.
I also mentioned that, make your judgement on whether to continue with that employer, since you may need full support from employer at many stages.
I agree that, the employee should get the required paperwork he is supposed to keep. And H1B full filing paperwork is one of them. I am sure the H1B filing paperwork will have some high level financial report of the company.
PERM supporting documentation, I140 supporting documentation are not necessarily to be distributed to employees. But I agree, employee should ask for and get a copy of the original PERM application (not supporting documentation) and I140 approval notice at minimum.
You are correct in your comments to a certain extent. However such secrecy does not help in the application process and employer tends to deprive the paperwork details to the employee leading to abuse. Financial information is not just needed at PERM stage but also at I140 stage especially when the employee gets a A2P RFE. I have also heard employees taking financial details of the company with them when traveling to get their H1 visa stamped.
I must admit however that my knowledge with sole proprietorship and private companies is limited. Others who have worked in such companies may know more and can tell from their experience (If the employer was good).
more...
house wallpaper iphone 4 wallpapers
casinoroyale
08-19 08:12 PM
Thanks, is this e-file?
Filed July 1 2008 - NSC
Approved last week
Filed July 1 2008 - NSC
Approved last week
tattoo Football Girl Baby HD iPhone 4
sidbee
10-20 02:50 PM
I have never seen a travel agent offer a price which is lower than what's on the airline website.
Lufthansa on website quotes 3200$ per person (chepeast phl->del->phl) Travel agent got for 1100$
Lufthansa on website quotes 3200$ per person (chepeast phl->del->phl) Travel agent got for 1100$
more...
pictures Tags : hd, hq, iphone 4
shaikhshehzadali
07-18 10:56 PM
Check out this google spread sheet I have created. It has just data and I would like some brainstorming analysis. Data looks interesting for NSC.
http://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?key=pc7r_IoPSQd0LpUOTh490EA&hl=en_US
1.The dates in VB did not move much from Sep 06 to May 07. I did not collect pre sep 06 data.
2.140 / 485 moved very slowly inspite of no movement in VB. which means lesser people filed and theoritically it should be faster processing by NSC. Yes I did not consider other trivial processing like AP / EAD.
3. If the above holds true for June 07 and July 07, then no matter how much VB moves, the NSC / TSC processing of 485 is going to slow down once it reaches June 2007 and it is going to come to grinding halt if it reaches July 2007. This may be for years if what USCIS claims as resource shortage for such processing delays.
4. The worst news is the people who have stuck in Backlog centers. With having their PD In 2001 and 2002, they are unfairly sent to the back of the line and stuck in 485 processing for ever.
As IV, we have to raise our voice for those backlogged labor fellows and bring some justice to them. I do not know how, but at least we should try. They should not be left behind for none of their faults.
Dude these points have already been discussed in other threads....
Most of the people agree...but everybody was more interested in filing I485...rather than understanding how painful EAD/AP renewal will be going forward..
http://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?key=pc7r_IoPSQd0LpUOTh490EA&hl=en_US
1.The dates in VB did not move much from Sep 06 to May 07. I did not collect pre sep 06 data.
2.140 / 485 moved very slowly inspite of no movement in VB. which means lesser people filed and theoritically it should be faster processing by NSC. Yes I did not consider other trivial processing like AP / EAD.
3. If the above holds true for June 07 and July 07, then no matter how much VB moves, the NSC / TSC processing of 485 is going to slow down once it reaches June 2007 and it is going to come to grinding halt if it reaches July 2007. This may be for years if what USCIS claims as resource shortage for such processing delays.
4. The worst news is the people who have stuck in Backlog centers. With having their PD In 2001 and 2002, they are unfairly sent to the back of the line and stuck in 485 processing for ever.
As IV, we have to raise our voice for those backlogged labor fellows and bring some justice to them. I do not know how, but at least we should try. They should not be left behind for none of their faults.
Dude these points have already been discussed in other threads....
Most of the people agree...but everybody was more interested in filing I485...rather than understanding how painful EAD/AP renewal will be going forward..
dresses Iphone+4+wallpapers+hd
nissan_1
04-30 08:49 AM
What kind of Adminstrative processing...is it Name check?? If it is name check, then it may take from 1 month to 6 month to get clearance...I personally was stuck in New Delhi for name check and got clearence within one month...but one of close friend was stuck for 6 months...
more...
makeup Wallpaper for iPhone 4
waitnwatch
06-10 06:41 PM
EB1-OR requires the employer to petition and I don't know of any case where they have done it for post-doc but that is not to say there isn't any such employer. The problem with postdoc appointment is that it has a end date unlike the "permanent" at will employment. For EB1-OR, USCIS has gone back and forth between requiring tenure-track or not for prof. appointments.
One option is to try to convert the post-doc to some sort of research scientist or research professor appointment. That would make the job open ended instead of term limited.
Additionally for EB1-OR you have to show 3 years of post degree experience. Most post-docs are for 2 or 3 years so if this is the first employment after Ph.D it would not be possible to apply for EB1-OR. On the other hand EB1-EA is a possibility but the bar for EB1 is now set pretty high atleast from my experience with the process. Of course EB2 NIW is a possibility but the problem with that is the requirement to prove why getting a labor certification is to the detriment of the US. Also after all the EB2 NIW paperwork a successful application would still mean waiting in line. The silver lining though with NIW is that one could change jobs but still carry the approval with himself/herself.
One option is to try to convert the post-doc to some sort of research scientist or research professor appointment. That would make the job open ended instead of term limited.
Additionally for EB1-OR you have to show 3 years of post degree experience. Most post-docs are for 2 or 3 years so if this is the first employment after Ph.D it would not be possible to apply for EB1-OR. On the other hand EB1-EA is a possibility but the bar for EB1 is now set pretty high atleast from my experience with the process. Of course EB2 NIW is a possibility but the problem with that is the requirement to prove why getting a labor certification is to the detriment of the US. Also after all the EB2 NIW paperwork a successful application would still mean waiting in line. The silver lining though with NIW is that one could change jobs but still carry the approval with himself/herself.
girlfriend Gold, HD Wallpaper, iPhone 4,
jsb
01-08 10:31 AM
You are right. People who are not married may not use EAD. But, they could always use AC21 by transferring h1
How does anybody get three red dots? It tells that you are infamous? Why, and who makes anyone infamous?
How does anybody get three red dots? It tells that you are infamous? Why, and who makes anyone infamous?
hairstyles pictures iphone 4 wallpapers
ramus
08-21 02:09 PM
I sent you PM yesterday.. please check and send me your info..
Thanks.
I am from Charlotte NC too....
Thanks.
I am from Charlotte NC too....
axp817
02-21 08:13 AM
What does the RFE say?
Could it be because of the 140 having been revoked by your last employer?
Hope things work out for you.
Could it be because of the 140 having been revoked by your last employer?
Hope things work out for you.
willIWill
05-07 02:19 PM
Yes, that is indeed strange! Interestingly the reduction in the demand seen is from Years that are not current now; probably due to porting to higher categories. Then the question is what is USCIS really doing ?!! Do they themselves have any Idea ?!!!
Another thing where USCIS processing is not making sense at all.. Only less than 1000 visas consumed by EB3 ROW between March and May when this category should consume over 30,000 visa a year and that's without getting spillover
The same sad story near August/September they realize much of the 30,000 visas are left and they rush to approve random applications
Another thing where USCIS processing is not making sense at all.. Only less than 1000 visas consumed by EB3 ROW between March and May when this category should consume over 30,000 visa a year and that's without getting spillover
The same sad story near August/September they realize much of the 30,000 visas are left and they rush to approve random applications
No comments:
Post a Comment