smartboy75
07-08 11:32 AM
Friends: I just got done e-filing EAd and AP renewals for my spouse and Myself. I have few questions just to make sure I did it right. Please guide me.
1) I just used my sign-in user and password to file for my spouse and myself EAd and AP in one application. Is that ok or should spouse use his own user-id and password combo to make applications. Like screen should this -
I-765 (xyz-myself) - $340.00
I-765 (abc- spouse) - $340.00
I-131 (xyz myself) - $ 310
I-131 (abc spouse) - $ 310
confirm... finish.... Is this ok I selected Finish and boom money was cashed out. Did I do it right?
2) The final transcript came out with info like mail supporting documents to USCIS office.. I am lost.. which documents to mail to USCIS. Please someone guide me.
Thanks a Lot
nkavjs
It does'nt matter if u use ur id or u create separate ids....
As far as documents are concerned...I have already replied above...kindly refer to that...
Hope that helps...
1) I just used my sign-in user and password to file for my spouse and myself EAd and AP in one application. Is that ok or should spouse use his own user-id and password combo to make applications. Like screen should this -
I-765 (xyz-myself) - $340.00
I-765 (abc- spouse) - $340.00
I-131 (xyz myself) - $ 310
I-131 (abc spouse) - $ 310
confirm... finish.... Is this ok I selected Finish and boom money was cashed out. Did I do it right?
2) The final transcript came out with info like mail supporting documents to USCIS office.. I am lost.. which documents to mail to USCIS. Please someone guide me.
Thanks a Lot
nkavjs
It does'nt matter if u use ur id or u create separate ids....
As far as documents are concerned...I have already replied above...kindly refer to that...
Hope that helps...
wallpaper 2011 fat people quotes. funny
inskrish
09-27 03:57 AM
I got the following email notification for the reciept number for I-485?
When i check the staus it says Document Production or Oath Ceremony. Is it an error or is this something I should take seriosly? Anyone with similar experience?
Hi,
You will get your FP Notice soon.
Regards,
IK
When i check the staus it says Document Production or Oath Ceremony. Is it an error or is this something I should take seriosly? Anyone with similar experience?
Hi,
You will get your FP Notice soon.
Regards,
IK
GCard_Dream
08-13 05:32 PM
Yes, my attorney did do the interfile after the 2nd 140 was approved. I talked to USCIS numerous time asking them the status of interfile and they kept on insisting that "Interfile" is essentially a myth and there is no so called linking of 140 to the pending I-485 has to happen. If you have multiple immigrant petition approved on your behalf, they are all under the same A# assigned to you. Whenever and IO opens your file, he is able to see all the immigrant petitions approved on your behalf and will use the which ever immigrant petition is more beneficial to the applicant (EB2 in my case).
GCard_Dream,
CONGRATULATIONS!
Did you/ your attorney interfile after second EB2 I-140 approval? Or USCIS automatically looked at your EB2 I-140 and approved I-485 pending application which was originally filed with EB3 I-140.
thanks
GCard_Dream,
CONGRATULATIONS!
Did you/ your attorney interfile after second EB2 I-140 approval? Or USCIS automatically looked at your EB2 I-140 and approved I-485 pending application which was originally filed with EB3 I-140.
thanks
2011 of a lean and fat people.
snathan
05-13 10:12 PM
Questions for you.
1. Did the extension receipt say received before Sep 30, 2009?
2. Did your company incorrectly write the H1B start date?
3. When did you get your approval?
It looks like this is an error with USCIS to me. The reason being, USCIS had approved your H1B extension along with new I-94. So basically you were out of status when they approved your H1B extension. If that was the case then they would have denied your I-94.
His employer requested the I-94 with later data and its not USCIS's error.
1. Did the extension receipt say received before Sep 30, 2009?
2. Did your company incorrectly write the H1B start date?
3. When did you get your approval?
It looks like this is an error with USCIS to me. The reason being, USCIS had approved your H1B extension along with new I-94. So basically you were out of status when they approved your H1B extension. If that was the case then they would have denied your I-94.
His employer requested the I-94 with later data and its not USCIS's error.
more...
lkapildev
01-18 03:24 PM
few folks whose PD is 2001 are stuck on NC process. NC process has been very efficent recently. You can call or take a appointment to local USCIS they will tell you.
My assumption is there are enough applicants whose NC is cleared to fill this years quote. Count to LC Subs also in this list
There may be people who have LC Sub of as old as 2000 or less.
Blame everyone. Blame you employeer too if they have given or sold some of their old labor to anyone.
BTW i used a LC Sub as i have a typical condition. L1 maxing our the L1 limit. Could not manage to get H1B on Lottery.
My assumption is there are enough applicants whose NC is cleared to fill this years quote. Count to LC Subs also in this list
There may be people who have LC Sub of as old as 2000 or less.
Blame everyone. Blame you employeer too if they have given or sold some of their old labor to anyone.
BTW i used a LC Sub as i have a typical condition. L1 maxing our the L1 limit. Could not manage to get H1B on Lottery.
actaccord
01-18 05:13 PM
a planned/scheduled visit to congressmen through IV chapters.
Let all IV chapters have a single point agenda (may be gaining support for a particular bill) prepared and validated by IV core team.
Let a IV chapter member get an appointment around 2 - 4 weeks (for some it could be long wait time) from the date of scheduling to meet their lawmaker (if more than one there for a chapter lets target one potential candidate and next ...)
Different members meet their respective lawmaker at different time frame to keep the issue active in their mind/list.
I am trying to get something started through my local IV chapter and before I do reach out I want to be clear what to communicate and what not to communicate with the law makers. I did gone through the document "Guide-Meet Law makers" and got some basic idea (need to go through again to gain more details).
At this point I am not into the race of GC, so I am not sure if I go alone would get any reasonable impact with the law maker.
Lets try to do one or two chapter members meet the law maker a month from a chapter.
Let all IV chapters have a single point agenda (may be gaining support for a particular bill) prepared and validated by IV core team.
Let a IV chapter member get an appointment around 2 - 4 weeks (for some it could be long wait time) from the date of scheduling to meet their lawmaker (if more than one there for a chapter lets target one potential candidate and next ...)
Different members meet their respective lawmaker at different time frame to keep the issue active in their mind/list.
I am trying to get something started through my local IV chapter and before I do reach out I want to be clear what to communicate and what not to communicate with the law makers. I did gone through the document "Guide-Meet Law makers" and got some basic idea (need to go through again to gain more details).
At this point I am not into the race of GC, so I am not sure if I go alone would get any reasonable impact with the law maker.
Lets try to do one or two chapter members meet the law maker a month from a chapter.
more...
dagabaaj
10-08 12:58 PM
Sorry about the bereavement in your family. On the FP appointment notice there is a number you can call to reschedule. To my knowledge I do not know of anyone having to do this, but your situation seems genuine. I would also get a (sorry if this sounds out of place) death cert for the deceased and let the authorities know of the same. They should be willing reschedule. Good lick!!
2010 or just some really funny
karsat
11-05 03:29 PM
I'm also in the same situation as you do...I would suggest to hire an attorney yourself and work with him so that you have piece of mind....or else we get panicked....
more...
bestia
01-24 08:47 PM
Yates memo explicitly states, that new salary doesn't have to be the same. The only thing is that your new job must be "same or similar". If your salary was $50k and you changed the job and started getting $120k, then there no way USCIS IO will believe that your new job is "same or similar". And if you worth $120k, then there is no way that IO will believe that your intent was working for $50 after getting GC. Both cases are violations and your AOS have good chances to be denied.
But "same or similar" can (and does) differ by 10-20%, the market is dynamic, a person might get a new job with lower salary, but better befits or better perspectives, stock options, etc. IOs should understand that (at least immigration judges must). I don't think 10-20% difference really matters.
This not a legal advise, just how I think this applies.
But "same or similar" can (and does) differ by 10-20%, the market is dynamic, a person might get a new job with lower salary, but better befits or better perspectives, stock options, etc. IOs should understand that (at least immigration judges must). I don't think 10-20% difference really matters.
This not a legal advise, just how I think this applies.
hair Fat People Funny
gccovet
07-16 12:18 PM
Hi
I had asked in my last thread, if someone could help me understand what happens on the PD becomes current and the 485 is pending?
Will i be assigned visa no., come August 1? or that shall happen only when my 485 is approved?
thanks
Here's what will happen,
Say there are 1000 VISA's available, and there are 1100 I-485 with PD current, depending on PD, those 1000 VISA's will be allocated, rest 100 will wait.
Now, once VISA # is allocated, even if the category become 'U', it will not effect those I-485s.
At this point, you don't have to do anything, just keep an eye /check with your lawyer if there is any RFE and respond immediately.
HTH
Regards
GCCovet
I had asked in my last thread, if someone could help me understand what happens on the PD becomes current and the 485 is pending?
Will i be assigned visa no., come August 1? or that shall happen only when my 485 is approved?
thanks
Here's what will happen,
Say there are 1000 VISA's available, and there are 1100 I-485 with PD current, depending on PD, those 1000 VISA's will be allocated, rest 100 will wait.
Now, once VISA # is allocated, even if the category become 'U', it will not effect those I-485s.
At this point, you don't have to do anything, just keep an eye /check with your lawyer if there is any RFE and respond immediately.
HTH
Regards
GCCovet
more...
wait4ever
08-11 10:43 PM
Everyone seems to have a different experience / message trail when getting the approvals for the GC, I have started this thread so that all those who recd. their approvals in August or earlier can post what messages they got from CRIS etc. and how long it took them to get the cards etc.
Here we go...
I got the CRIS approval e-mail stating that I-485 has been approved - on the 4th - Got the approval Notice in the mail on the 11th Aug.
I have not recd. any other e-mail like CPO or welcome note etc.
Thanks for the inputs.
Here we go...
I got the CRIS approval e-mail stating that I-485 has been approved - on the 4th - Got the approval Notice in the mail on the 11th Aug.
I have not recd. any other e-mail like CPO or welcome note etc.
Thanks for the inputs.
hot hairstyles fat people funny. Really Fat really fat people pictures. really
Googler
01-18 02:12 PM
In conversations with various people from USCIS this week (TSC IO and USCIS assistant director's staff), it has become clear to me that USCIS no longer preadjudicates applications i.e. if your application is retrogressed, they set it aside completely.
Why should we care?
Suppose, the last quarter of the fiscal year rolls around (in July) and as per usual DOS starts to panic about the number of greencards leftover, and moves the date significantly all of a sudden.
Now take a hypothetical situation of one person with PD 2001 who happened to go and get stuck in the namecheck, another person with PD 2005 who didn't get stuck in namecheck and therefore had his file assigned to an adjudicator before the current round of retrogression hit.
Guess what will happen in the free for all in July-Sept? Greencards are handed out left and right to fully adjudicated applicants regardless of the priority date order. Person with PD in 2005 gets a greencard, whereas PD 2001 person who first got stuck in DOL, then in namecheck, is stuck once again for no fault of their own. The people who have suffered the most already pay the price yet again.
If pre-adjudication in priority date order was the norm, when dates moved, greencards would be given out in a fair, first in first out way.
Why should we care?
Suppose, the last quarter of the fiscal year rolls around (in July) and as per usual DOS starts to panic about the number of greencards leftover, and moves the date significantly all of a sudden.
Now take a hypothetical situation of one person with PD 2001 who happened to go and get stuck in the namecheck, another person with PD 2005 who didn't get stuck in namecheck and therefore had his file assigned to an adjudicator before the current round of retrogression hit.
Guess what will happen in the free for all in July-Sept? Greencards are handed out left and right to fully adjudicated applicants regardless of the priority date order. Person with PD in 2005 gets a greencard, whereas PD 2001 person who first got stuck in DOL, then in namecheck, is stuck once again for no fault of their own. The people who have suffered the most already pay the price yet again.
If pre-adjudication in priority date order was the norm, when dates moved, greencards would be given out in a fair, first in first out way.
more...
house dresses fat people r funny fat
getgreensoon1
04-18 12:50 PM
I think it was told before. Please try not to post unreliable information. When I worked in a law office we processed few EB cases with online degrees from Accredited Institutions in the US. USCIS can't reject a degree that is Regionally or Nationally Accredited. If a school has been accredited to issue a degree, the degree is valid and must be treated as a real degree including for immigration purposes.
You must have worked in law firm back in the dotcom days when evern milkmen from villages got their greencards in eb1/2 category. Things have changed a lot buddy. Any qualifications earned during employment cannot be used to qualify for a higher category at the same employer. This was the rule told by a reputed law from not the one that caters to the shady desi bodyshops.
You must have worked in law firm back in the dotcom days when evern milkmen from villages got their greencards in eb1/2 category. Things have changed a lot buddy. Any qualifications earned during employment cannot be used to qualify for a higher category at the same employer. This was the rule told by a reputed law from not the one that caters to the shady desi bodyshops.
tattoo really funny fat people pics.
PundaSmith
12-24 07:52 AM
Hello,
Thanks for a very informative forum. I am a tenure-track assistant professor in a mid-size private university. I am currently on a TN-1 status (though I am not originally from Canada).
I want to file my I-140 & 485 concurrently since my priority date has been current for my place of birth for quite some time. Here are my credentials:
Education/Experience: 3 Years (Earned PhD in 2006)
Discipline: Social Sciences
Publications:
Number of peer reviewed publications: 2 (2 more are provisionally accepted pending revisions)
Other publications: 4 (Two book chapters - one in a book published by Cambridge University Press; three Canadian government sponsored research reports)
About 15 presentations at National and International conferences (mainly US & Canada)
I know my publication record need to be beefed up a bit, and I expect to get more stuff out next year.
Recognition/Impact:
Citation: One of my co-authored publications - which is about 9 years old - has been cited about 100 times; all the newer publications (those published since 2006 have been cited about 20 times)
National / International Impact: Acts as a pro-bono consultant for a US federal agency on a specific issue in my area of research; works as a contract researcher for a Canadian municipal government and a university-affiliated research centre.
Judge of the work of others:
Reviewer of manuscripts for 4 journals;
One book reviewer (would finish one more in the next year)
Major Prizes/Recognition
None (hopefully, one day)
Hopefully, towards the end of 2010, I want to apply for EB1a (Outstanding Researcher Category). My University has recommended an attorney to handle my application. The attorney is charging close to $7,000 for me and my two kids; filling fees extra - this is for both I-140 and I-485 (though the firm is willing to work out a payment plan after an initial down payment).
Given the expense involved, is it advisable that I represent myself and file the papers (but then get help for specific issues: review of the application package, RFE, appeals, etc)?
Has anyone here in a similar situation followed a similar path?
thanks for your help ... Punda
Thanks for a very informative forum. I am a tenure-track assistant professor in a mid-size private university. I am currently on a TN-1 status (though I am not originally from Canada).
I want to file my I-140 & 485 concurrently since my priority date has been current for my place of birth for quite some time. Here are my credentials:
Education/Experience: 3 Years (Earned PhD in 2006)
Discipline: Social Sciences
Publications:
Number of peer reviewed publications: 2 (2 more are provisionally accepted pending revisions)
Other publications: 4 (Two book chapters - one in a book published by Cambridge University Press; three Canadian government sponsored research reports)
About 15 presentations at National and International conferences (mainly US & Canada)
I know my publication record need to be beefed up a bit, and I expect to get more stuff out next year.
Recognition/Impact:
Citation: One of my co-authored publications - which is about 9 years old - has been cited about 100 times; all the newer publications (those published since 2006 have been cited about 20 times)
National / International Impact: Acts as a pro-bono consultant for a US federal agency on a specific issue in my area of research; works as a contract researcher for a Canadian municipal government and a university-affiliated research centre.
Judge of the work of others:
Reviewer of manuscripts for 4 journals;
One book reviewer (would finish one more in the next year)
Major Prizes/Recognition
None (hopefully, one day)
Hopefully, towards the end of 2010, I want to apply for EB1a (Outstanding Researcher Category). My University has recommended an attorney to handle my application. The attorney is charging close to $7,000 for me and my two kids; filling fees extra - this is for both I-140 and I-485 (though the firm is willing to work out a payment plan after an initial down payment).
Given the expense involved, is it advisable that I represent myself and file the papers (but then get help for specific issues: review of the application package, RFE, appeals, etc)?
Has anyone here in a similar situation followed a similar path?
thanks for your help ... Punda
more...
pictures makeup Really fat people
GCcomesoon
09-12 09:55 AM
Hi
Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense.Now that EB3 is pushed back all the way to April 2001 , then one would ask how come cases from 2002-2003 which were processed approved in this year ( june - july when all were current ? ) If that holds true then why have the dates gone back to 2001 when 2003 -2004 cases have been cleared ? May be this demand-supply thing
Please clarify , that would help:
Thanks
GCcomesoon
Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense.Now that EB3 is pushed back all the way to April 2001 , then one would ask how come cases from 2002-2003 which were processed approved in this year ( june - july when all were current ? ) If that holds true then why have the dates gone back to 2001 when 2003 -2004 cases have been cleared ? May be this demand-supply thing
Please clarify , that would help:
Thanks
GCcomesoon
dresses funny pictures of fat people
antihero
04-14 11:04 PM
I don't see any need of hiring an attorney at this point. In a best case scenario you will get your GC without any further queries from CIS when your PD becomes current. If at all you get an rfe you can you can hire an attorney at that point and work through them. You can even approach your old company's attorney to respond to any queries from CIS. After all they are business ppl and they will work for anybody who pays them their fee.
In fact for most of the simple rfes you don't even need a lawyer. You can do it yourself.
In fact for most of the simple rfes you don't even need a lawyer. You can do it yourself.
more...
makeup really funny pictures of fat
wandmaker
02-23 12:30 PM
My company has goofed up a little in my GC filing. My 6yrs of H1 will get over on 01-05-2010 (I've counted here H1 end date + days outside USA in past), so they were supposed to file my GC PERM 365 days, before that i.e. they
should have filed my GC PERM by 01-05 but they missed it by few
days and filed it on 01-09-2009.
Obviously, I've to file H1 extension later this year and for that
according to the rule, that I should have filed my GC PERM 365 days
before H1 end will not satisfy...so I'll be in soup....am I correct in
understanding this rule of 365 days? or is there a change in this rule
or some caveat which I don't know that will help me still filing my H1
extension?
Or can I go to India now for couple of weeks and that will solve my
problem?
Please let me know, what are the available options for me
Thanks
You have already accounted time spent outside US to derive end date for 6 year term, which is 01-05-2010. Spending sometime outside US is advisable and safest bet, will allow you to file for H1 extension. If you are lucky, who knows, your perm & 140 may get approved before 01/05/2010.
should have filed my GC PERM by 01-05 but they missed it by few
days and filed it on 01-09-2009.
Obviously, I've to file H1 extension later this year and for that
according to the rule, that I should have filed my GC PERM 365 days
before H1 end will not satisfy...so I'll be in soup....am I correct in
understanding this rule of 365 days? or is there a change in this rule
or some caveat which I don't know that will help me still filing my H1
extension?
Or can I go to India now for couple of weeks and that will solve my
problem?
Please let me know, what are the available options for me
Thanks
You have already accounted time spent outside US to derive end date for 6 year term, which is 01-05-2010. Spending sometime outside US is advisable and safest bet, will allow you to file for H1 extension. If you are lucky, who knows, your perm & 140 may get approved before 01/05/2010.
girlfriend 2010 really funny fat people
mps
08-14 10:49 AM
No there is very little that can be done in the absence of a written contract. Also, I presume, you did'nt get it in writing from the employer that it was okay to join the client.
Understand that most consulting firms will not object if a client absorbs their employees if there is scope for repeat business. But that does not mean that they will not be displeased at the loss of revenue for themselves.
In any case, LC belongs to them and they have every right to use that as an incentive for another employee.
I am surprised why you did'nt wait until I140 was filed and approved before joining the client.
Well, joining the client was never an issue because only on this condition the consulting company is in preferred vendor list (i.e. client has option to hire).
Understand that most consulting firms will not object if a client absorbs their employees if there is scope for repeat business. But that does not mean that they will not be displeased at the loss of revenue for themselves.
In any case, LC belongs to them and they have every right to use that as an incentive for another employee.
I am surprised why you did'nt wait until I140 was filed and approved before joining the client.
Well, joining the client was never an issue because only on this condition the consulting company is in preferred vendor list (i.e. client has option to hire).
hairstyles really funny fat people
ken
10-01 12:50 AM
Here is my situation
I opted for renewing the AP online on Sept 22,2009.Got the receipt at the same time, and next day which is Sept 23 i sent the supporting documents along with the cover letter,2 photographs ,confirmation receipt ,485 receipt, DL copy and passport copy from Priority Mail with delivery confirmation. Today when I tried to check the status on postal website it says that document scanned on Sept 23 which means they haven't reached the destination, now this concerns me because previously when ever I applied AP and sent the supporting documents they normally take 2 to 3 business days to reach.
Now my question:
1) If suppose the AP supporting documents get lost in mail then can I send the documents again and if in the mean time postal service delivers the first set
In between I see soft LUD's of 9/25,28,30 on my AP
All responses to the above matter is highly appreciated
I opted for renewing the AP online on Sept 22,2009.Got the receipt at the same time, and next day which is Sept 23 i sent the supporting documents along with the cover letter,2 photographs ,confirmation receipt ,485 receipt, DL copy and passport copy from Priority Mail with delivery confirmation. Today when I tried to check the status on postal website it says that document scanned on Sept 23 which means they haven't reached the destination, now this concerns me because previously when ever I applied AP and sent the supporting documents they normally take 2 to 3 business days to reach.
Now my question:
1) If suppose the AP supporting documents get lost in mail then can I send the documents again and if in the mean time postal service delivers the first set
In between I see soft LUD's of 9/25,28,30 on my AP
All responses to the above matter is highly appreciated
irock
10-03 02:59 PM
I am apalled at your intepretation of what I said. I do not see much point in responding to your allegations. My only point is that any system however broken, should be FIFO to the extent possible. If you think anyone who believes in this wants others to suffer, then that's your problem.
I completely agree with you, though my PD is not current right now.
I completely agree with you, though my PD is not current right now.
snathan
06-19 03:58 PM
Your manager and HR looks like unprofessional people. I don't know the complete situation you were in, but usually managers try not to behave like this because they don't want other existing employees to know that they behave like this when someone resigns.
Sometimes its like working with a pig. When you regret you fought with a pig, its enjoying it.
Sometimes its like working with a pig. When you regret you fought with a pig, its enjoying it.
No comments:
Post a Comment