ash27
03-31 11:10 AM
I�m currently employed by a desi consulting co. working at an end client. I would like to bypass the desi co. and join vendor like Tek Systems on their W2. My I-140 and 485 has been pending since 6 months.
I would like to find out if having conditional employment at the time of adjudication of I-485 would cause any issues? Also, can I present offer letter from a different employer even though I�m not on their payroll at the time of adjudication of I-485 application. Please advice
I would like to find out if having conditional employment at the time of adjudication of I-485 would cause any issues? Also, can I present offer letter from a different employer even though I�m not on their payroll at the time of adjudication of I-485 application. Please advice
wallpaper Tags: sanrio room hello kitty
H1B_CIVIL_ENGINEER
06-20 03:17 PM
Dear Friend:
Thank you for contacting me regarding border security and comprehensive immigration reform. I welcome your thoughts and comments.
As a border state, Texas benefits from the contributions of legal immigrants, but it is also uniquely vulnerable to the negative impacts of illegal immigration. My principles on this issue have been clear and consistent: we must secure our borders and discourage illegal behavior.
We must address the safety and security needs of the United States. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have worked to appropriate increased funding for border security, which includes high-tech tools, additional Border Patrol agents, Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators, detention officers, and detention beds.
Far too much of our border goes unprotected. I have pushed to expand the presence of unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, to help provide the tools that law enforcement officers need to protect the southwest border. I set the goal of covering all 2,000 miles of the U.S-Mexico border every single day of the week.
I recently joined with other border state Senators to offer a series of amendments to heighten border security. Shortly after my colleagues and I introduced our amendments, the President announced a proposal for increased border security funding. After de-emphasizing border security, and even proposing to cut forces on the southwest border, this was a welcome shift in policy. Unfortunately, our border security amendments failed in the Senate, but we will continue to work toward providing the tools, manpower, and resources needed to protect our border.
We have a broken immigration system that is not fair to those who are waiting to enter the country through the legal channels, or to the American people who live by the rule of law. We need fundamental reform of our visa policy, our temporary worker program, our identification systems, our family unity laws, and so much more.
We have the 21st century technology to make our safety and security a reality. It is the responsibility of the federal government to fix our broken immigration system and to secure our borders. This is a duty that I take very seriously. You may be certain that I will keep your views in mind immigration reform is considered in the Senate.
I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue that is important to you.
Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator
284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5922 (tel)
202-224-0776 (fax)
Thank you for contacting me regarding border security and comprehensive immigration reform. I welcome your thoughts and comments.
As a border state, Texas benefits from the contributions of legal immigrants, but it is also uniquely vulnerable to the negative impacts of illegal immigration. My principles on this issue have been clear and consistent: we must secure our borders and discourage illegal behavior.
We must address the safety and security needs of the United States. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have worked to appropriate increased funding for border security, which includes high-tech tools, additional Border Patrol agents, Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators, detention officers, and detention beds.
Far too much of our border goes unprotected. I have pushed to expand the presence of unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, to help provide the tools that law enforcement officers need to protect the southwest border. I set the goal of covering all 2,000 miles of the U.S-Mexico border every single day of the week.
I recently joined with other border state Senators to offer a series of amendments to heighten border security. Shortly after my colleagues and I introduced our amendments, the President announced a proposal for increased border security funding. After de-emphasizing border security, and even proposing to cut forces on the southwest border, this was a welcome shift in policy. Unfortunately, our border security amendments failed in the Senate, but we will continue to work toward providing the tools, manpower, and resources needed to protect our border.
We have a broken immigration system that is not fair to those who are waiting to enter the country through the legal channels, or to the American people who live by the rule of law. We need fundamental reform of our visa policy, our temporary worker program, our identification systems, our family unity laws, and so much more.
We have the 21st century technology to make our safety and security a reality. It is the responsibility of the federal government to fix our broken immigration system and to secure our borders. This is a duty that I take very seriously. You may be certain that I will keep your views in mind immigration reform is considered in the Senate.
I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue that is important to you.
Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator
284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5922 (tel)
202-224-0776 (fax)
gcwanter
09-21 10:42 AM
my 140 is yet to be amended.
as usual i am stuck between employer and lawyer and dont know where they are in the process of deciding to amend
there are many corporate changes happening...i am checking with them..but they have not responded yet.
please let us know what your lawyer says.
as usual i am stuck between employer and lawyer and dont know where they are in the process of deciding to amend
there are many corporate changes happening...i am checking with them..but they have not responded yet.
please let us know what your lawyer says.
2011 Chic Bedroom Accessories in
WeldonSprings
07-08 06:18 PM
Also, I am trying to see if there is an opportunity here to add the Menendez bill as an amendment to the Senate bill and the Honda bill as an amendment to the House bill on Family and Employment Visa recpture.
more...
lost_in_migration
05-14 07:50 PM
Are you referring to Congressional Agenda cspan channel 1?
There is a live debate going on CIR
Currently Rep. Charles Gonzalez ( D-Texas, 20th District, San Antonia) supporting the CIR.
There is a live debate going on CIR
Currently Rep. Charles Gonzalez ( D-Texas, 20th District, San Antonia) supporting the CIR.
avi_ny
08-15 07:43 PM
Or just the receipt number? if you got the notice, did you come to know about the rejection after receiving the notice?
In any case, you have only until tomorrow.. so act fast. If you field through your lawyer, he would typically have all info in his system. What is the list of documents you sent out last time? Cross-check that with the list of documents on "filing for AOS yourself" thread on IV. Or at least just paste your list here. I have re-filed today, and may be able to help review your list of documents if you are from the EB category.
Contact a lawyer and do resend papers by tomorrow. Make sure you attach the online status printout.
In any case, you have only until tomorrow.. so act fast. If you field through your lawyer, he would typically have all info in his system. What is the list of documents you sent out last time? Cross-check that with the list of documents on "filing for AOS yourself" thread on IV. Or at least just paste your list here. I have re-filed today, and may be able to help review your list of documents if you are from the EB category.
Contact a lawyer and do resend papers by tomorrow. Make sure you attach the online status printout.
more...
dpp
06-27 02:13 PM
USCIS
Nebraska Service Center
850 S Street
P.O. Box (Insert Correct P.O. Box Number)
Lincoln, NE 68508
link (http://149.101.23.2/graphics/fieldoffices/nebraska/aboutus.htm)
find the po box and enter it in the address.(very important)
from the USCIS website:
I-140 -concurrent w/I-485 or I-485 filed separately:
USCIS NSC
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501-7485
My lawyer used the following address when filing I-140.
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
US Dept. of Homeland Security
850 S Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
There is no PO Box number mentioned in that. I don't know how it works. But as per USCIS web site, it says they need correct PO box number, but if you see the exact address that my attorney used while filing I-140 doesn't have any PO box number.
Only GOD knows on how it went to correct department for processing.
Nebraska Service Center
850 S Street
P.O. Box (Insert Correct P.O. Box Number)
Lincoln, NE 68508
link (http://149.101.23.2/graphics/fieldoffices/nebraska/aboutus.htm)
find the po box and enter it in the address.(very important)
from the USCIS website:
I-140 -concurrent w/I-485 or I-485 filed separately:
USCIS NSC
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501-7485
My lawyer used the following address when filing I-140.
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
US Dept. of Homeland Security
850 S Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
There is no PO Box number mentioned in that. I don't know how it works. But as per USCIS web site, it says they need correct PO box number, but if you see the exact address that my attorney used while filing I-140 doesn't have any PO box number.
Only GOD knows on how it went to correct department for processing.
2010 Hello Kitty House with Pink in
indianabacklog
04-15 11:35 AM
Your question about can your employer withdraw the H1. Since you have your green card approved this is not an issue, the approval of your green card has taken care of that. Once your I485 is approved your visa status is null and void which effectively means your wife's H4 status is also gone. You can only be an H4 dependent if you have an H1 holder on which to depend.
more...
roseball
07-12 01:22 PM
All these are backlogged 485 cases which were filed in 2005 or earlier (before retrogression hit) and couldnt be approved as the dates were not current....They are approving them now based on June/July bulletin dates.....Cant believe they are approving these backlogged cases which would be current in July and are refusing to accept new 485s.....
hair Lambs and Ivy Hello Kitty
gcfriend65
10-08 04:21 PM
Hi, I was not talking about the FP form. I was talking about the FP letter of appointment or FP notice, on which we can re-schedule. Please, can somebody upload a sample copy.
You want everything to be spoon-feeded .:)
The FP form is a simple form and any one who know English may fill it easily.
Since we are not allowed to take camera or cell phone we cannot take a snapshot of the form. I can recall following things on FP
Your A# number, I-485 receipt #(it;s on your FP notice), Address, B'Day
Employer Name , Address, Phone( This I am not sure)
Hope it helps
You want everything to be spoon-feeded .:)
The FP form is a simple form and any one who know English may fill it easily.
Since we are not allowed to take camera or cell phone we cannot take a snapshot of the form. I can recall following things on FP
Your A# number, I-485 receipt #(it;s on your FP notice), Address, B'Day
Employer Name , Address, Phone( This I am not sure)
Hope it helps
more...
BharatPremi
09-30 11:10 PM
Paper filed applications are much quicker than e-filed ones at USCIS. The reason is that their internal processes are still designed for paper processing only. The e-filed application is converted to paper before being processed. Since the supporting documents are shipped separately by the applicant, the time it takes to bring the supporting documentation to the file adds to the delay. The only advantage with e-filing is the instant gratification of a receipt number.
That makes sense. I wish somebdoy who e-filed recently come up with their own recent experience.
That makes sense. I wish somebdoy who e-filed recently come up with their own recent experience.
hot HELLO KITTY BEDROOM DECOR SELF
spicy_guy
11-09 02:33 PM
hi puding, i am also in the same boat as yours, I need to travel to India during nov 3rd week. I have efiled my AP at nebraska on aug 6th and i am seriously if i will get my AP before that. i have already booked my tickets, and concerned, if i will not get this AP. with the ticket prices these days, even if we postpone/cancel, we lose so much money on top of the AP money that we paid to USCIS. this does not make sense at all. I am going to say this loud, PAPPU or ANY IV admins, can you please help us in this.
Were you able to travel? Did you get it in time?
Were you able to travel? Did you get it in time?
more...
house Modern Children Bedroom Design
krishmunn
04-18 01:00 PM
hi,
First, I am not your "buddy" and secondly, I was referring to Online Degrees being valid and not to "experience" gained per se. If you can't be nice, try not to write because it will appear by all means that your degree is fraudulent ;)
Ignore friend... getgreensoon1 is having tough time understanding the difference between "Education" and "Experience" . He thinks since both start with E they must be one and same ;)
Irony is, someone talking about "prestigious" US Masters does not even know highschool english.
First, I am not your "buddy" and secondly, I was referring to Online Degrees being valid and not to "experience" gained per se. If you can't be nice, try not to write because it will appear by all means that your degree is fraudulent ;)
Ignore friend... getgreensoon1 is having tough time understanding the difference between "Education" and "Experience" . He thinks since both start with E they must be one and same ;)
Irony is, someone talking about "prestigious" US Masters does not even know highschool english.
tattoo Posted in Decoration, Teen
sunny1000
06-15 07:04 PM
I think u guys can make a quick trip to Canada/ Mexico and on your return, u will recieve a new I94.
Going to Canada won't help as you retain the same I-94, if it is still valid, in order to get back. You submit the I-94 only if you are leaving Canada to another country without coming back into the U.S.
For Mexico, I think you still need the current I-94 which you will have to submit at the border. Please correct me if I am wrong on this.
Please call the USCIS office and ask them what needs to be done.
Going to Canada won't help as you retain the same I-94, if it is still valid, in order to get back. You submit the I-94 only if you are leaving Canada to another country without coming back into the U.S.
For Mexico, I think you still need the current I-94 which you will have to submit at the border. Please correct me if I am wrong on this.
Please call the USCIS office and ask them what needs to be done.
more...
pictures Filed under Bedroom Furniture
mariofan
02-25 04:38 PM
im well into nintendo lounge ! ask me anything!
dresses Funny Hello Kitty Bed Photo
MDix
02-02 03:24 PM
Congratulation !.
Sharma pls take a moment and confirm your PD. Folks are looking for your PD confirmation. Here and here:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=23168&page=5.
Thanks,
MDix
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Approval notice sent.
On January 30, 2009, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service
Sharma pls take a moment and confirm your PD. Folks are looking for your PD confirmation. Here and here:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=23168&page=5.
Thanks,
MDix
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Approval notice sent.
On January 30, 2009, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service
more...
makeup Architecture and Design
raj2007
04-02 01:39 PM
---
apb, good to see you again.
AabTuagaGc: Congratulations on your marriage. apb is right. Get your spouse here on H4 and then add her to your existing 485 application. Your attorney should guide you when you can technically add her to your application.
On a lighter note: It seems you didn't do this research beforehand, shows me that it must have been love at first sight ;-)
Cheers!
There is nothing like adding to his application. She need to file her own 485 application and her process timinging will be different than primary.
apb, good to see you again.
AabTuagaGc: Congratulations on your marriage. apb is right. Get your spouse here on H4 and then add her to your existing 485 application. Your attorney should guide you when you can technically add her to your application.
On a lighter note: It seems you didn't do this research beforehand, shows me that it must have been love at first sight ;-)
Cheers!
There is nothing like adding to his application. She need to file her own 485 application and her process timinging will be different than primary.
girlfriend Lambs and Ivy Hello Kitty
mallu
02-19 05:09 PM
Agree... I think no more FPs after the initial ones.. even for EAD renewals.. Thats a good news...
But first time FP if applied EAD included both 485 & EAD (code level 3)...
Not sure the above is true.
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4309
But first time FP if applied EAD included both 485 & EAD (code level 3)...
Not sure the above is true.
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4309
hairstyles Chic Bedroom Accessories in
Libra
09-10 04:17 PM
bump
gc28262
07-03 08:30 AM
washingtonpost.com (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/02/AR2010070204359.html?hpid=opinionsbox1)
By Jeb Bush and Robert D. Putnam
Saturday, July 3, 2010
On our national birthday, and amid an angry debate about immigration, Americans should reflect on the lessons of our shared immigrant past. We must recall that the challenges facing our nation today were felt as far back as the Founders' time. Immigrant assimilation has always been slow and contentious, with progress measured not in years but in decades. Yet there are steps communities and government should take to form a more cohesive, successful union.
Consider what one leader wrote in 1753: "Few of their children in the country learn English. The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages. . . . Unless the stream of their importation could be turned . . . they will soon so outnumber us that we will not preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious." Thus Ben Franklin referred to German Americans, still the largest ethnic group in America (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-35.pdf). A century later, Midwestern cities such as Cincinnati and St. Louis were mostly German-speaking. So worried were their native-born neighbors that Iowa outlawed speaking German in public and even in private conversation.
Proponents and opponents of immigration agree on one thing: Learning English is crucial to success and assimilation. Yet learning a language as an adult is hard, so first-generation immigrants often use their native tongue. Historically, English has dominated by the second or third generation in all immigrant groups. Most recent immigrants recognize that they need to learn English, and about 90 percent of the second generation speak English (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/82.pdf), according to the Pew Hispanic Center. Research by sociologists Claude Fischer and Michael Hout published in 2008 suggests that English acquisition among immigrants today is faster than in previous waves.
Residential integration of immigrants is even more gradual. Half a century ago, sociologist Stanley Lieberson showed that most immigrants lived in segregated enclaves, "Little Italy" or "Chinatown," for several generations. This segregation reflected discrimination by natives and the natural desire of "strangers in a strange land" to live among familiar faces with familiar customs. Only with suburbanization, encouraged by government policy in the 1950s and 1960s, did the children and grandchildren of the immigrants of the 1890s and 1900s exit those enclaves. That many of today's immigrants live in ethnic enclaves is thus entirely normal and reflects no ominous aim to separate themselves from the wider American community
Immigrant intermarriage, then and now, also demonstrates steady progress over generations. In the 1960s, more than half a century after Italian immigration peaked, about 40 percent of second-generation Italians married non-Italians. This pattern characterizes today's immigrants: 39 percent of U.S.-born Latinos marry non-Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center. (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/755-marrying-out.pdf)Intermarriage among second-generation Asian Americans is even more common. Today's immigrants are, on average, assimilating socially even more rapidly than earlier waves.
One important difference, however, that separates immigration then and now: We native-born Americans are doing less than our great-grandparents did to welcome immigrants.
A century ago, religious, civic and business groups and government provided classes in English and citizenship. Historian Thomas P. Vadasz found that in Bethlehem, Pa., a thriving town of about 20,000, roughly two-thirds of whom were immigrants, the biggest employer, Bethlehem Steel, and the local YMCA offered free English instruction to thousands of immigrants in the early 20th century, even paying them to take classes. Today, immigrants face long waiting lists for English classes, even ones they pay for.
Why is this important? A legal immigration system is the not-so-secret edge in a competitive, interconnected world economy. Immigrants enhance our ability to grow and prosper in the dynamic global marketplace. We will need every possible advantage to expand our economy amid its fiscal challenges. Moreover, the aging of our population places a premium on young, productive workers, many of whom must come from immigration.
To improve their integration into our American community, we should:
-- Provide low-cost English classes, in cooperation with local civic and religious groups, where immigrants build personal ties with co-ethnics and native-born Americans. These connections foster assimilation and help newcomers navigate our complex institutions.
-- Invest in public education, including civics education and higher education. During the first half of the 20th century, schools were critical to preparing children of immigrants for success and fostering a shared national identity.
-- Assist communities experiencing rapid increases in immigration, which is traumatic for those arriving here and for receiving communities. Schools and hospitals bear disproportionate costs of immigration, while the economic and fiscal benefits from immigration accrue nationally.
Assimilation does not mean immigrants shed ethnic identities. Our national experience with hyphenated identities shows that good Americans can retain a strong sense of ethnic identity.
We've lived our national motto, "E Pluribus Unum" ("Out of Many, One"), better than any other country. But we ought not to airbrush our ancestors' difficulties in assimilation, nor fail to match our forebears' efforts to help integrate immigrants. Government, churches, libraries, civic organizations and businesses must cooperate to address this challenge, as they did a century ago.
Jeb Bush was governor of Florida from 1999 to 2007. Robert D. Putnam is the Malkin professor of public policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.
By Jeb Bush and Robert D. Putnam
Saturday, July 3, 2010
On our national birthday, and amid an angry debate about immigration, Americans should reflect on the lessons of our shared immigrant past. We must recall that the challenges facing our nation today were felt as far back as the Founders' time. Immigrant assimilation has always been slow and contentious, with progress measured not in years but in decades. Yet there are steps communities and government should take to form a more cohesive, successful union.
Consider what one leader wrote in 1753: "Few of their children in the country learn English. The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages. . . . Unless the stream of their importation could be turned . . . they will soon so outnumber us that we will not preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious." Thus Ben Franklin referred to German Americans, still the largest ethnic group in America (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-35.pdf). A century later, Midwestern cities such as Cincinnati and St. Louis were mostly German-speaking. So worried were their native-born neighbors that Iowa outlawed speaking German in public and even in private conversation.
Proponents and opponents of immigration agree on one thing: Learning English is crucial to success and assimilation. Yet learning a language as an adult is hard, so first-generation immigrants often use their native tongue. Historically, English has dominated by the second or third generation in all immigrant groups. Most recent immigrants recognize that they need to learn English, and about 90 percent of the second generation speak English (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/82.pdf), according to the Pew Hispanic Center. Research by sociologists Claude Fischer and Michael Hout published in 2008 suggests that English acquisition among immigrants today is faster than in previous waves.
Residential integration of immigrants is even more gradual. Half a century ago, sociologist Stanley Lieberson showed that most immigrants lived in segregated enclaves, "Little Italy" or "Chinatown," for several generations. This segregation reflected discrimination by natives and the natural desire of "strangers in a strange land" to live among familiar faces with familiar customs. Only with suburbanization, encouraged by government policy in the 1950s and 1960s, did the children and grandchildren of the immigrants of the 1890s and 1900s exit those enclaves. That many of today's immigrants live in ethnic enclaves is thus entirely normal and reflects no ominous aim to separate themselves from the wider American community
Immigrant intermarriage, then and now, also demonstrates steady progress over generations. In the 1960s, more than half a century after Italian immigration peaked, about 40 percent of second-generation Italians married non-Italians. This pattern characterizes today's immigrants: 39 percent of U.S.-born Latinos marry non-Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center. (http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/755-marrying-out.pdf)Intermarriage among second-generation Asian Americans is even more common. Today's immigrants are, on average, assimilating socially even more rapidly than earlier waves.
One important difference, however, that separates immigration then and now: We native-born Americans are doing less than our great-grandparents did to welcome immigrants.
A century ago, religious, civic and business groups and government provided classes in English and citizenship. Historian Thomas P. Vadasz found that in Bethlehem, Pa., a thriving town of about 20,000, roughly two-thirds of whom were immigrants, the biggest employer, Bethlehem Steel, and the local YMCA offered free English instruction to thousands of immigrants in the early 20th century, even paying them to take classes. Today, immigrants face long waiting lists for English classes, even ones they pay for.
Why is this important? A legal immigration system is the not-so-secret edge in a competitive, interconnected world economy. Immigrants enhance our ability to grow and prosper in the dynamic global marketplace. We will need every possible advantage to expand our economy amid its fiscal challenges. Moreover, the aging of our population places a premium on young, productive workers, many of whom must come from immigration.
To improve their integration into our American community, we should:
-- Provide low-cost English classes, in cooperation with local civic and religious groups, where immigrants build personal ties with co-ethnics and native-born Americans. These connections foster assimilation and help newcomers navigate our complex institutions.
-- Invest in public education, including civics education and higher education. During the first half of the 20th century, schools were critical to preparing children of immigrants for success and fostering a shared national identity.
-- Assist communities experiencing rapid increases in immigration, which is traumatic for those arriving here and for receiving communities. Schools and hospitals bear disproportionate costs of immigration, while the economic and fiscal benefits from immigration accrue nationally.
Assimilation does not mean immigrants shed ethnic identities. Our national experience with hyphenated identities shows that good Americans can retain a strong sense of ethnic identity.
We've lived our national motto, "E Pluribus Unum" ("Out of Many, One"), better than any other country. But we ought not to airbrush our ancestors' difficulties in assimilation, nor fail to match our forebears' efforts to help integrate immigrants. Government, churches, libraries, civic organizations and businesses must cooperate to address this challenge, as they did a century ago.
Jeb Bush was governor of Florida from 1999 to 2007. Robert D. Putnam is the Malkin professor of public policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.
tnite
06-27 01:33 PM
What is the best way to mail 485 so that it can reach on July 2nd - Monday. As July 1st is Sunday i beleive no mail system will deliver the package on that day.
Given that, what is advisable to do? How about sending the package with over-night mail on Friday, so that it can reach there on Monday as Sat, Sun USCIS is closed and will not accept applications.
If you search IV , some one mentioned that since the address is a PO Box , FEDEX/UPS/DHL will not deliver.
You can mail the package on Friday (2 day) or Saturday(Overnight but will be delivered the next business day. ie Monday )
Given that, what is advisable to do? How about sending the package with over-night mail on Friday, so that it can reach there on Monday as Sat, Sun USCIS is closed and will not accept applications.
If you search IV , some one mentioned that since the address is a PO Box , FEDEX/UPS/DHL will not deliver.
You can mail the package on Friday (2 day) or Saturday(Overnight but will be delivered the next business day. ie Monday )
No comments:
Post a Comment