sanju_dba
09-10 12:03 PM
Guys, we have to do something.
Don't rely on IV to do anything for EB3-I. Most of IV core are EB2 and they are already benefited by this spillover changes.
would that be IVEB3.org ? :confused:
Don't rely on IV to do anything for EB3-I. Most of IV core are EB2 and they are already benefited by this spillover changes.
would that be IVEB3.org ? :confused:
wallpaper Hats and Hairstyles after 1945
coopheal
12-30 09:47 PM
Bump
intheyan
08-12 10:14 AM
grupak
What does your Notice to welcome mail looks like Do the have anything like "Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later" in the Sentnece. Please uodate. Does that mean an inperson interview
Two sets (4 emails between spouse and self) of CPO emails on August 7th, welcome email on August 8th. That's it so far. And a soft LUD on August 9th.
What does your Notice to welcome mail looks like Do the have anything like "Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later" in the Sentnece. Please uodate. Does that mean an inperson interview
Two sets (4 emails between spouse and self) of CPO emails on August 7th, welcome email on August 8th. That's it so far. And a soft LUD on August 9th.
2011 cute hairstyles hats,
newtoh1
07-09 02:19 PM
I am little confused here.
1) What is the difference between status and authorized period of stay?
2) If I start using EAD and I go out of USA, while return back to USA, if I show Advanced Parole I am assuming Port of entry guys will issue me new I94 card and status they mention on it as Parolee.Right?Do you think I have to do that without going into out of status?
1) What is the difference between status and authorized period of stay?
2) If I start using EAD and I go out of USA, while return back to USA, if I show Advanced Parole I am assuming Port of entry guys will issue me new I94 card and status they mention on it as Parolee.Right?Do you think I have to do that without going into out of status?
more...
gccovet
05-22 07:47 AM
I sent my renewal application with $305 fee for me and my spouse each. USCIS sent it back asking me to resend the application with new fee $385. Even I thought that fee does not apply to AOS status candidates unless USCIS has misjudged my application type which I don't think so because I had specified my current status on the application. So the fee is $385.
I hope you checked the correct box on the first page of i-131.
I just paid $305.00 and worked for me.
Regards
-GCCovet
I hope you checked the correct box on the first page of i-131.
I just paid $305.00 and worked for me.
Regards
-GCCovet
user1205
08-13 06:24 PM
she should refile free of charge since it's her fault for sending it too soon.
She's trying to bully you with that start date of July VB.
I'd ask ASAP for a copy of the whole package (which is your right to have) and re-file on my own or find a cheaper lawyer. You can just copy whatever she did and change the check box for previous filing.
$2500 is a rip off ... mine only charged $1000 plus the USCIS fees.
She's trying to bully you with that start date of July VB.
I'd ask ASAP for a copy of the whole package (which is your right to have) and re-file on my own or find a cheaper lawyer. You can just copy whatever she did and change the check box for previous filing.
$2500 is a rip off ... mine only charged $1000 plus the USCIS fees.
more...
pomogranate
11-21 06:37 PM
:crying:
2010 Winona Ryder#39;s hat hairstyle
conchshell
07-29 01:41 PM
For all those people who are waiting for the GC
decide on a date.
all the pepole who are aiting for their gc skip their work on that the day.stop all activities on that day (shopping..... etc)
and let the people know how difficult it would be to live without you.....
The only person who gets mad with this non-cooperation will be your better half :D But at the same time he/she will come to know how difficult it would be to live without you :D:D
decide on a date.
all the pepole who are aiting for their gc skip their work on that the day.stop all activities on that day (shopping..... etc)
and let the people know how difficult it would be to live without you.....
The only person who gets mad with this non-cooperation will be your better half :D But at the same time he/she will come to know how difficult it would be to live without you :D:D
more...
pcs
02-08 03:28 PM
I have my original 1-140 & everything else. What advantage do I get over having only photocopies of I-140 etc. ???
Thanks
Thanks
hair arterton-bob-hairstyle-hat
royu
04-22 12:38 PM
Just to mention that :
MBA of University of Phoneix is condidered for H1B, Adavnced degree quota.
If you have MBA of University of Phoneix, you can get Visa under H1B , Adavnced degree quota.
So Online degrees are not useless.
MBA of University of Phoneix is condidered for H1B, Adavnced degree quota.
If you have MBA of University of Phoneix, you can get Visa under H1B , Adavnced degree quota.
So Online degrees are not useless.
more...
RNGC
09-19 02:23 PM
NY/NJ....we did not see lot of representation from you...
Its time to prove that you guys work in the ECONOMIC CAPITAL OF THE WORLD!
Pull up your slevees and start planning...
Most of the TV stations are in NY, so start planning for the rally soon...sometime late OCT....The weather should be good for wearing formal suits.....
Imagine 1000+ people dressed in formal suits, walking in NY streets in front of all those big ompanies...it will be a huge media attraction....
Just two rallies is not enough......Every state should do this!!!!
This time we will get it straight about adding
"Legal Immigrants - Highly skilled workers" at the bottom of all the slogans....
Its time to prove that you guys work in the ECONOMIC CAPITAL OF THE WORLD!
Pull up your slevees and start planning...
Most of the TV stations are in NY, so start planning for the rally soon...sometime late OCT....The weather should be good for wearing formal suits.....
Imagine 1000+ people dressed in formal suits, walking in NY streets in front of all those big ompanies...it will be a huge media attraction....
Just two rallies is not enough......Every state should do this!!!!
This time we will get it straight about adding
"Legal Immigrants - Highly skilled workers" at the bottom of all the slogans....
hot Women Hair Styles With Stylesh
jatinr
08-07 08:31 PM
My employer says its the company's policy not to file for EAD or AP for all its employees. They are just filing the 485. I am sure that they(employer and lawyer) will not be giving me the 485 reciept or the fedex reciept
What options do I have ?
My company has filed my I-485 and not EAD/AP on July 20th.
I want to file EAD/AP on my own using old forms and old fees before August 17th.
I would like to know if I can send it NSC where I-485 was filed or as per the new instructions given for direct filing effec July 30th as per new forms.
Can I file without recieving I-485 receipt by just using Fedex Receipt and Copy of the cheque sent. As this point the cheque is not cleared and I have not received any receipt.
Does the filing with Fedex option is for people who have filed after July 17th?
What options do I have ?
My company has filed my I-485 and not EAD/AP on July 20th.
I want to file EAD/AP on my own using old forms and old fees before August 17th.
I would like to know if I can send it NSC where I-485 was filed or as per the new instructions given for direct filing effec July 30th as per new forms.
Can I file without recieving I-485 receipt by just using Fedex Receipt and Copy of the cheque sent. As this point the cheque is not cleared and I have not received any receipt.
Does the filing with Fedex option is for people who have filed after July 17th?
more...
house hairstyles with hats.
subba
03-05 04:48 PM
Please note that the no.of credits you accrue (max of 4 per year, minimum of 40 required) also determines how much your SS retirement benefits are.
I am not quite sure how the benefit "scales" with credits. Maybe someone more knowledgable can comment.
I think its 10 yrs of work where you paid SS tax.
I am not quite sure how the benefit "scales" with credits. Maybe someone more knowledgable can comment.
I think its 10 yrs of work where you paid SS tax.
tattoo hairstyles with hats
ashkam
07-20 10:04 AM
Hi, My employer is not giving me the original H1 approval notice (i-797A) because it states on the notice on the 2nd paragraph
"The petitioner should keep the upper portion of the notice. The lower portion should be given to the worker"
The lower portion is the new i-94.
What is this? Can they do this? How can I get the visa stamped without the original notice? Gurus please help.
Usually, you also get an I-797C notice along with the I-797. (this one does not have the I-94 at the bottom) for your own use. I can't remember now whether the CIS sends it to you or your attorney. You can use this to get a stamp. Contact your attorney and ask him whether he has this notice.
"The petitioner should keep the upper portion of the notice. The lower portion should be given to the worker"
The lower portion is the new i-94.
What is this? Can they do this? How can I get the visa stamped without the original notice? Gurus please help.
Usually, you also get an I-797C notice along with the I-797. (this one does not have the I-94 at the bottom) for your own use. I can't remember now whether the CIS sends it to you or your attorney. You can use this to get a stamp. Contact your attorney and ask him whether he has this notice.
more...
pictures Hairstyles and Hats, 1796
sathishkrish
09-18 12:16 PM
We will be meeting our attorney soon to go over this topic - From the initial comments that I heard from him, He didn't think they have lot to do - not sure what he meant by that.
God forbidden, I dont have to go thru 140 refilling all over again:mad:
God forbidden, I dont have to go thru 140 refilling all over again:mad:
dresses hairstyles, hats and
drirshad
09-25 06:25 AM
Political tide turning on illegal immigration
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/23/MNGOGLBFP31.DTL
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Saturday, September 23, 2006
(09-23) 04:00 PDT Washington -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert stood before the cameras Thursday placing big red check marks on a list of nine border-enforcement bills that have passed the House -- including a 700- mile, double-layer fence ridiculed by critics all year but headed for the Senate floor next week.
At least for now, House Republican leaders have succeeded in their take-no-prisoners approach to immigration despite nationwide protests by Latinos last spring and White House warnings that they are endangering their party's future.
Refusing to compromise with the Senate and their own president to widen paths to legal entry and give the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country now an avenue to citizenship, Hastert and other House GOP leaders have successfully framed that approach as amnesty.
The House has prevailed "because that's where the country is," said Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River (Sacramento County). "This is a situation where members in both the House and the Senate have listened to the folks back home."
Critics conceded a setback but argued that it would be temporary. They said enforcement alone won't stop illegal immigration but will alienate Latino voters, the nation's fastest-growing voter bloc. They said it will turn Republicans into a minority party, much as when former Gov. Pete Wilson won re-election in 1994 on an anti-immigrant platform that ultimately helped make California a Democratic-majority state.
"There are very serious political implications to what they are doing today," said Cecilia Munoz, chief lobbyist for the National Council of La Raza. "If 40 percent of my community supported Bush in the 2004 elections, it's very hard to imagine in this environment that proportion of Latinos voting for candidates from a party which continues to insult them."
For now, however, the political tide clearly favors enforcement first, legalization later.
"Not even a year ago, if you talked about a fence, you were an extremist who wanted to wall off the United States," said Rosemary Jenks, government affairs director for Numbers USA, a group opposing immigration on population grounds. "Now the fence is a no-brainer."
By large margins, with the votes of as many as 105 Democrats, the House passed three enforcement bills Thursday. One, which was approved unanimously, outlaws building an unauthorized tunnel across the border.
The measures were plucked from a larger bill by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., that passed the House in December and sparked widespread protests that brought millions of Latinos and their allies into the streets of major cities. That bill would have made illegal presence in the country or aiding illegal immigrants a felony -- ideas House Republicans dropped after sharp criticism.
Two other bills would allow state and local law enforcement authorities to enforce immigration laws, and a third would allow indefinite detention of illegal immigrants considered dangerous and would speed deportation of those who have committed crimes or belong to gangs.
House leaders plan to attach those measures to the homeland security spending bill.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who with Bush and a minority of Senate Republicans supported coupling tougher enforcement with legalization, has cleared the way for Senate consideration of the fence measure next week.
Recalling the brief Senate moment in May when Republicans and Democrats joined in a comprehensive legalization and enforcement bill, Frist said the "fundamental sticking point" was what to do about the 12 million undocumented immigrants now in the country.
Frist said everyone agrees with border enforcement.
"We can't have hundreds of thousands of people running across that lower border of the United States of America," Frist said. "Let's go ahead and do what we all agree ... needs to be done, and that is to focus on securing our border."
Lungren said his conversations with GOP colleagues in the Senate lead him to believe that "they now understand the magnitude of the feeling out there that we've got to get control of our border."
He said the current legislation is "Not Pete Wilson redux ... because of the overall recognition that you've got to do something about enforcing the border."
Their majority status in danger -- in part because of their failure to control spending -- Republicans have made immigration a campaign theme for 2006, hoping that anger over illegal immigration will bring otherwise disheartened conservatives to the polls in an off-year election.
Still, national polls released this week found immigration far down on voters' concerns behind the war in Iraq, terrorism and the economy. Asked by New York Times/Bloomberg News pollsters to select their most pressing issue in the upcoming midterm elections, only 4 percent of registered voters chose immigration.
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant group, conceded that if Republicans retain their House majority, their tough stand on immigration will be given wide credit, posing a serious hurdle to the push for broader legalization.
He predicted his side eventually will prevail nonetheless.
"I'm glad it's being tested in this election because we're going to be around for a long time," Sharry said. "The population of undocumented immigrants is going to continue to grow, the political clout of the Latino community is going to continue to grow, the American people are going to continue to be frustrated, and the people building the fence are going to be held to account."
Ironically, the fence legislation coincides with the Department of Homeland Security's award of an $80 million contract to Boeing -- the first stage of a plan expected to cost much more than $2.1 billion -- to construct a "virtual fence" along all 6,000 miles of U.S. land borders, north and south. The new technology -- including sensors, ground radars and other technology in addition to physical barriers -- will begin in a 28-mile sector near Tucson, Ariz.
Asked at a briefing why additional fence legislation was necessary, Michael P. Jackson, deputy secretary of homeland security, said, "The bill is a sign of the commitment and the focus that Congress is bringing to the border."
Jackson repeatedly stressed that a fence is far from the only method the department is considering. "It would be a mistake to try to infer from that 28 miles that you now just take that and spread it across the border in some ham-handed way," Jackson said.
E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at clochhead@sfchronicle.com.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/23/MNGOGLBFP31.DTL
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Saturday, September 23, 2006
(09-23) 04:00 PDT Washington -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert stood before the cameras Thursday placing big red check marks on a list of nine border-enforcement bills that have passed the House -- including a 700- mile, double-layer fence ridiculed by critics all year but headed for the Senate floor next week.
At least for now, House Republican leaders have succeeded in their take-no-prisoners approach to immigration despite nationwide protests by Latinos last spring and White House warnings that they are endangering their party's future.
Refusing to compromise with the Senate and their own president to widen paths to legal entry and give the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country now an avenue to citizenship, Hastert and other House GOP leaders have successfully framed that approach as amnesty.
The House has prevailed "because that's where the country is," said Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River (Sacramento County). "This is a situation where members in both the House and the Senate have listened to the folks back home."
Critics conceded a setback but argued that it would be temporary. They said enforcement alone won't stop illegal immigration but will alienate Latino voters, the nation's fastest-growing voter bloc. They said it will turn Republicans into a minority party, much as when former Gov. Pete Wilson won re-election in 1994 on an anti-immigrant platform that ultimately helped make California a Democratic-majority state.
"There are very serious political implications to what they are doing today," said Cecilia Munoz, chief lobbyist for the National Council of La Raza. "If 40 percent of my community supported Bush in the 2004 elections, it's very hard to imagine in this environment that proportion of Latinos voting for candidates from a party which continues to insult them."
For now, however, the political tide clearly favors enforcement first, legalization later.
"Not even a year ago, if you talked about a fence, you were an extremist who wanted to wall off the United States," said Rosemary Jenks, government affairs director for Numbers USA, a group opposing immigration on population grounds. "Now the fence is a no-brainer."
By large margins, with the votes of as many as 105 Democrats, the House passed three enforcement bills Thursday. One, which was approved unanimously, outlaws building an unauthorized tunnel across the border.
The measures were plucked from a larger bill by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., that passed the House in December and sparked widespread protests that brought millions of Latinos and their allies into the streets of major cities. That bill would have made illegal presence in the country or aiding illegal immigrants a felony -- ideas House Republicans dropped after sharp criticism.
Two other bills would allow state and local law enforcement authorities to enforce immigration laws, and a third would allow indefinite detention of illegal immigrants considered dangerous and would speed deportation of those who have committed crimes or belong to gangs.
House leaders plan to attach those measures to the homeland security spending bill.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who with Bush and a minority of Senate Republicans supported coupling tougher enforcement with legalization, has cleared the way for Senate consideration of the fence measure next week.
Recalling the brief Senate moment in May when Republicans and Democrats joined in a comprehensive legalization and enforcement bill, Frist said the "fundamental sticking point" was what to do about the 12 million undocumented immigrants now in the country.
Frist said everyone agrees with border enforcement.
"We can't have hundreds of thousands of people running across that lower border of the United States of America," Frist said. "Let's go ahead and do what we all agree ... needs to be done, and that is to focus on securing our border."
Lungren said his conversations with GOP colleagues in the Senate lead him to believe that "they now understand the magnitude of the feeling out there that we've got to get control of our border."
He said the current legislation is "Not Pete Wilson redux ... because of the overall recognition that you've got to do something about enforcing the border."
Their majority status in danger -- in part because of their failure to control spending -- Republicans have made immigration a campaign theme for 2006, hoping that anger over illegal immigration will bring otherwise disheartened conservatives to the polls in an off-year election.
Still, national polls released this week found immigration far down on voters' concerns behind the war in Iraq, terrorism and the economy. Asked by New York Times/Bloomberg News pollsters to select their most pressing issue in the upcoming midterm elections, only 4 percent of registered voters chose immigration.
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant group, conceded that if Republicans retain their House majority, their tough stand on immigration will be given wide credit, posing a serious hurdle to the push for broader legalization.
He predicted his side eventually will prevail nonetheless.
"I'm glad it's being tested in this election because we're going to be around for a long time," Sharry said. "The population of undocumented immigrants is going to continue to grow, the political clout of the Latino community is going to continue to grow, the American people are going to continue to be frustrated, and the people building the fence are going to be held to account."
Ironically, the fence legislation coincides with the Department of Homeland Security's award of an $80 million contract to Boeing -- the first stage of a plan expected to cost much more than $2.1 billion -- to construct a "virtual fence" along all 6,000 miles of U.S. land borders, north and south. The new technology -- including sensors, ground radars and other technology in addition to physical barriers -- will begin in a 28-mile sector near Tucson, Ariz.
Asked at a briefing why additional fence legislation was necessary, Michael P. Jackson, deputy secretary of homeland security, said, "The bill is a sign of the commitment and the focus that Congress is bringing to the border."
Jackson repeatedly stressed that a fence is far from the only method the department is considering. "It would be a mistake to try to infer from that 28 miles that you now just take that and spread it across the border in some ham-handed way," Jackson said.
E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at clochhead@sfchronicle.com.
more...
makeup Garbo film clip from -hats and
Rb_newsletter
04-27 12:57 PM
I agree as well that the law is fine, 60% of violence is caused by illegals.....
We legal folks just have to carry an extra document, doesnt hurt us in the long run.
You are assuming that local police officials understand all legal immigration laws. do local police know how many types of work visas are in practice? Do they know staying on I-94 extension? Do they know MTR, EAD, AP, etc. etc...? Do they understand spouse visas, student visa,
We legal folks just have to carry an extra document, doesnt hurt us in the long run.
You are assuming that local police officials understand all legal immigration laws. do local police know how many types of work visas are in practice? Do they know staying on I-94 extension? Do they know MTR, EAD, AP, etc. etc...? Do they understand spouse visas, student visa,
girlfriend hairstyles with hats.
jayleno
08-28 08:27 PM
I assume the question you are asking is directed to the host. If you are asking me...I have no clue myself....I share your confusion.
How come only 2006 and 2005 EB2 India PD applicants were invited to the party?.
How come only 2006 and 2005 EB2 India PD applicants were invited to the party?.
hairstyles hairstyles with hats.
sargon
03-24 09:17 PM
..You claim all German fathers rape their daughters...what is this based on...where is your proof...or do you just enjoy thrashing another culture for no reason.
BBC News - German incest father-of-eight Detlef S jailed (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12819626)
Fritzl case - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritzl_case)
BBC News - German incest father-of-eight Detlef S jailed (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12819626)
Fritzl case - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritzl_case)
ak_manu
04-09 02:51 PM
Hi,
My current EAD will expire in September 2008. It is applied through Company A. I want to change my employer in July to Company B. But I would think during
that time frame I would have already applied for my EAD renewal.
Can I transfer to Company B during this renewal process?
Thanks
AK
My current EAD will expire in September 2008. It is applied through Company A. I want to change my employer in July to Company B. But I would think during
that time frame I would have already applied for my EAD renewal.
Can I transfer to Company B during this renewal process?
Thanks
AK
tol
07-17 01:59 PM
The American Immigration Lawyers Association is now telling members not to expect an announcement today. It is not clear why USCIS has delayed an announcement, but I will report as I learn more....
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2007/07/aila-reporting-.html
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2007/07/aila-reporting-.html
No comments:
Post a Comment